Dear Friends, below is my response to opinion written by Mr. Barrette, and published in the Nevada Appeal. The editor of the Appeal gracefully granted equal space to allow me to response.
Note:
I have included Barrette's original published piece shown after my response.
Deep Thoughts, Cheap Shots & Bonbons
by Jim Shirk
Regarding John Barrette's commentary in the Nevada Appeal on July 23rd
I was not the first to share the news of the Hyatt Hotel project; as it was already alluded to by the Northern Nevada Development Association on its website. In addition to numerous rumors that ran rampant throughout the community.
Recently, when the downtown corridor project was before the board I stated, "there is a possibility of a downtown development of a Hotel, mid-sized convention center and other commercial/retail structures in the works for Carson City." For that reason, I made a motion to not proceed with the narrowing of Carson Street until we fully understand the effects this project could have on our community. The board voted against this simple yet precautionary motion.
Additionally, some members of the board have signed non-disclosure agreements with the NNDA. While simultaneously the NNDA is asking for $200,000 from the board, I do hope transparency prevails here.
Keeping in touch with my constituents and being involved in the community is not campaigning — it's what all elected officials should be doing.
Finally, let me share something my father told me: "never be satisfied with where you are in life — always strive to achieve more, do more, and be more than you are today."
So, as we draw closer to the election of 2016 and keeping in line with my commitment to be transparent, I will make sure my decision is quite clear if I re-run for my current ward position or make a bid for the mayor's seat.
In the meantime, we have much to discuss:
Citizens in our community are well versed and know that I have written, spoken and voted against the 1/8 of a cent sales tax increase. This tax increase has been passed by a majority vote (4-1) of the board; I cannot reverse or recall this tax increase.
It's now my responsibility to be part of the process to ensure your tax dollars will be spent wisely. Regardless of how I voted (nay) on the sales tax increase, each item that comes before the board under the sales tax increase now requires a new viewpoint and will involve a vote to approve or disapprove of any agenda item such as the: Animal Shelter; Multi-Purpose Athletic Center; and Corridors.
Regarding the proposed Business Improvement District Tax, if the majority of any group, businesses owners, or property owners fully support initiating a BID tax for the maintenance of improvements made within each corridor, it would seem reasonable to assume city staff will move forward with implementing procedures for this tax.
How can we stabilize our local economy? Some are saying, with the legalization of marijuana. Again, I was the lone vote against the resolution that permitted dispensaries, cultivation and the production facilities. First of all, I strongly believe any person who receives a prescription from their doctor should not be denied this legal remedy. Any person should be able to obtain any drug a doctor has approved and prescribed, including marijuana. My family has personally witnessed and experienced the positive side of how this drug can ease the physical pains associated with some diseases, which will allow for a more peaceful departure.
Here are the reasons I voted against this ordinance: the board did not limit the cultivation establishments, and the setbacks for dispensary from other community facilities were reduced from 1,000-feet to 300-feet.
At the Board of Supervisors meeting, I made a motion to allow one dispensary, and then six months later allow for another dispensary. After monitoring the dispensary facilities for one year, we could then allow the first cultivation facility. I expanded my motion to limit both dispensaries and cultivation to only two each in our community, and have the original setbacks remain. My reasoning to the board had been we should take a more gradual step-by-step approach rather than "jumping all in" as there were many considerations that make this a risky venture. My motion failed to pass.
I try to stay in touch with our community as much as I can. Please contact me regarding any events, ideas or concerns you may have.
Jim Shirk is supervisor for Ward 4. He can be reached at jshirk@carson.org or 775-720-5761.
Please forward this to your family, friends and neighbors.
Transparency & other assorted tee shots by John Barrette
A half century watching politicians means you rarely see something you haven't seen before or learn something new about the breed.
Certainly that is the case, for the most part, with Jim Shirk. We'll take up the caveat behind the phrase "for the most part" later. For now, however, let's focus on the self-avowed lover of Carson City's continual wooing of said city's voters. Shirk won a seat on the city's Board of Supervisors by barely beating Molly Walt, his predecessor from Ward 4, less than two years ago. But anyone paying attention noticed he didn't stop campaigning.
In a heartbeat, rumors began circulating Shirk covets the mayor's office. At first, word was he would run in 2016 if Mayor Robert Crowell didn't. Then there was even talk he might run then no matter what.
After Supervisor Shirk went public Monday with news the Hyatt hotels chain is eyeing downtown Carson City, which many colleagues wanted him to keep under his hat, it became obvious 2016 political questions were already warranted.
Calls to the mayor, Shirk and a couple of others whose names have circulated produced both ho-hum and intriguing results. The mayor said he hasn't yet decided. Garrett Lepire, realtor and property owner, and Ronni Hannaman, Chamber of Commerce executive director, basically said there's no truth to such rumors about them.
Shirk's answer was a hearty laugh and then a stiff-arm statement: "At this juncture I am not looking anywhere past this year." Lepire, meanwhile, had an entirely different take on whether Shirk was looking beyond 2014.
"I can almost guarantee you that he will run for mayor," said Lepire. He also expressed interest in eventually entering politics himself, but has no such plans, yet. He said he and Shirk occasionally golf together and he's sure the supervisor has his eye on the brass ring, a grab for the city's top policy-maker post.
Now, back to that "for the most part" caveat regarding anything new from ambitious politicians. I've rarely seen one with an eye on the prize so willing to anger most with whom he must work, which is what Shirk does regularly and did again with his comments about a possible hotel downtown. A half century of political observation tells me it won't make him mayor and could even jeopardize his re-election as supervisor.
An old political axiom is politics makes strange bedfellows, but this politician seems bent on making his bedfellows into strangers. Not so here, though; news people prefer transparency and that's the banner under which Shirk justified his disclosure regarding the potential downtown development.
When it comes to personal political ambition, however, it seems you have to be Shirk's golf partner to get a candid reading and any transparency beyond Dec. 31, 2014.
John Barrette, he can be reached at jbarrette@nevadaappeal.com.
Thank you for your time.
God Bless America
No comments:
Post a Comment